Programming Method and Response Mode in a Visual-Oral Task

Item

Title
Programming Method and Response Mode in a Visual-Oral Task
Date
1964
Index Abstract
Not Available
Photo Quality
Not Needed
Report Number
AMRL TR 64-129
Creator
Csanyi, Attila P.
Glaser, Robert
Reynolds, James H.
Corporate Author
University of Pittsburgh
Laboratory
Behavioral Sciences Laboratory
Extent
20
Identifier
AD0614014
Access Rights
CFSTI
Distribution Classification
1
Contract
AF 33(616)-7175
DoD Project
1710
DoD Task
171007
DTIC Record Exists
No
Distribution Change Authority Correspondence
None
Distribution Conflict
No
Abstract
Programming methods and response modes were investigated to determine effective training methods. The identification and pronunciation of phonetic symbols were taught by two different programing methods and two different response modes. The programing method featured either prompting or confirmation, and the response mode was either overt or covert. Achievement was measured on both a multiple choice test and a test requiring overt oral responses. Considerable variation occurred among the test scores for each learning condition. Differences among the conditions, tending to indicate the superiority of overt responding and of confirmation, were significant on only one case. Overt responding was superior for retention when measured by tests requiring overt oral responses. The prompting method coupled with the covert response mode tended to produce poorer learning and retention than the other conditions, but it required only 30 to 50 percent as much learning time as the other conditions.
Report Availability
Full text available
Date Issued
1964-12
Provenance
RAF Centre of Aviation Medicine
Type
report
Format
1 online resource